Every year on the anniversary of the bombing there is a moment of silence on campus and the bell tower tolls once for each student lost. Their photos are featured in the student union with their biographies; 35 students are named prestigious Remembrance Scholars in honor of those lost.
And so I bring this experience to the recent release of al-Megrahi, the only man convicted in the deaths of those 270 people. After serving seven years of a life sentence he has been released on “compassionate” grounds and I am struggling mightily with all of it. Mathematically, he served just 9 days for each life he took. That seems unacceptable to me. But I believe in compassion, I think. I want to forgive, to not feel a sense of outrage that this man is being allowed to go home to die. I want to believe that I believe in compassion, even in the face of utter evil. That the only way to end the cycle of violence is unabashed grace.
But in practice, I'm less forthcoming with forgiveness. I'm American; we sure do love vengeance and grudges even while we extol bible verses when they conform to our existing beliefs. We want to see someone held accountable for every injustice and we want to show no mercy (unless its to us). I want him to pay for his crime, but who am I to say he hasn't already? How are we to sentence one to death based solely on the worst moment in their life? What about all the other moments? How do I know what is in his heart, how do I know the crime hasn't haunted him for 21 years (that would be 28 days per life he took), that it will haunt him until his last breath? I don't. As a Christian I am called to forgive carte blanche, not when it is necessarily easy or justified. And by choosing to only forgive when it is easy, when it is offered, when it is convenient then really, what is my compassion worth?
I don't have a conclusion. This isn't easy on anybody.
2 comments:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1209588/Lockerbie-bomber-Al-Megrahi-sent-home-advice-just-ONE-GP.html
Considering that article, I think your conclusion should be "no, he shouldn't have been released." But perhaps you're thinking more generally. I'll think about that.
Two other thoughts to add to your thoughtful piece: In Libya, they added insult to injury by giving the bomber a hero's welcome, complete with cheers and parades. So he gets to die in peace, a hero in his homeland. Where is Libya's compassion for the victims he killed?
Second idea. Is forgiveness the same as not holding people accountable for their actions? I think they are two separate issues. I think we are called to forgive people, whether or not they ever apologize. The reason for this carte blanche forgiveness is not for their good, but for ours. As long as we hold onto our bitterness, we stand in the way of God dealing with that person, and it hurts us. Vengeance is mine, saith the LORD. Its a "Let go and let God" kind of approach.
But accountability is a different thing entirely. When my students misbehaved in class, they got whatever penalty they were supposed to get, but the next day, I still went on loving them. I remember Anna saying to me one day, "Wow, Mrs. Murphy. Even when we're bad, you still treat us just like we've never done anything wrong." I think that might be one way to hold someone accountable but to forgive them too.
Post a Comment